Journal Category
- All Journals
- Uncategorized (274)
- Art (22)
- Breaking News (10)
- Distinguished articles about history (1)
- Environmental (1)
- Finance and Economy (13)
- Front page (1)
- German/Bavarian Idustrial, Scientific News (2)
- Head Lines (11)
- International Politics News (20)
- Music (10)
- My Ads (2)
- My Journals (19)
- Photography (7)
- Significant Articles on International Politics (6)
- Swedish Affairs (7)
- Top Stories (2)
Journal Archive
- October 2008 (10)
- September 2008 (16)
- August 2008 (42)
- July 2008 (32)
- June 2008 (18)
- May 2008 (29)
- April 2008 (20)
- March 2008 (24)
- February 2008 (21)
- January 2008 (13)
- December 2007 (25)
- November 2007 (10)
- October 2007 (25)
- September 2007 (48)
- August 2007 (32)
- July 2007 (9)
- June 2007 (10)
- May 2007 (9)
- April 2007 (8)
- March 2007 (3)
- February 2007 (4)
Journal
Friday,Jul 4 2008, 09:20:37 AM Iranian should stop enrichment
Despite Iranian's recent attempt to appease the West and Americans!( My confirmation)
Washington holds firm to demands Iran suspend enrichment
Thu Jul 3, 7:09 PM ET
WASHINGTON (AFP) - The United States on Thursday maintained its demand that Iranuranium enrichment as a condition for Washington participating in formal nuclear talks with Tehran, although it did not rule out less strict pre-negotiations. suspend its
"We have talked to the Iranians previously via the P5-plus-1 and Mr. Solana about various ways to get to full-blown negotiations," State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said, referring to grouping of Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia and the United States, as well as EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana who has engaged Tehran on nuclear issues.
"In order to get to those full-blown negotiations where you have the US and the other five members of the P5-plus-1 present at the table with the Iranians, they are going to have to suspend their enrichment-related activity.
"And of course there would be a suspension of activities in the (UN) Security Council during that," McCormack added.
Asked about a formula known as "freeze for freeze" -- under which Tehran would freeze its nuclear enrichment program at current levels in exchange for no new UN Security Council sanctions -- the spokesman did not deny the possibility of implementing such a proposal ahead of further talks.
But he stressed that the six powers were still awaiting a formal response from Tehran to their fresh cooperation offer that Solana presented to Iran in mid-June.
The proposal, aiming at ending the five-year crisis over Tehran's nuclear program, offers technological incentives in exchange for Tehran suspending uranium enrichment.
Tehran denies that its program hides a nuclear weapons quest. US President George W. Bush has said that he has not ruled out using force against Iran to prevent it from acquiring nuclear weapons.
The Islamic republic has put forward its own package, a more all-embracing effort to solve global problems, and notably suggests the setting up of a consortium in Iran for enriching uranium.
A senior State Department official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that "there have been various discussions about quote-unquote 'pre-negotiations' or how to do a period leading up to full-blown negotiations."
But he stressed that "the conditions for us getting to the table and realizing full-blown negotiations are suspension (of enrichment). That

